Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Claas-Hendrik Berg's avatar

Wow. It seems you are really good with numbers and statistics. And you have a great insight into all the data you have collected. Cool. Because I have a wonderful idea that would stifle any criticism of your payout procedure forever: just show us every month, let's call it "Monthly payout wrapped," which artists every cent went to. Open Pandora's box. Everything else is just marketing.

Another idea: every month, you give us the choice to pay €1 directly to an artist. Without you skimming off any of it or passing it on. How about that?

Jason Henderson's avatar

The streaming business model is kind of silly. If I’m paying $12 a month to Apple Music then that money should go to who I listen to. Let’s say Apple (or Spotify) gets $5 off the top for providing the service. The other $6 would go to what I played. If I played one song that month (which would have to be a pretty damn good song) the $6 would go to that song; however it’s divided - record label, band, writer, etc. Whether I played the song once or 1000 times it wouldn’t matter. If I played 2 songs then the play count would factor in. Let’s assume I played them the same. Then each song owners would get three dollars. If I played 20 songs (or technically 20 plays) The owners would get $0.30 per stream. And so on and so forth. A person can only play so many songs per month. If I play 1000 streams, that would be $0.006 per stream. If Apple/Spotify have millions of subscribers, that royalty check adds up pretty quick. Plus, it would be nice to know that playing a song by some obscure artist, that they are getting a check in the mail. I guess technically the record label will be getting the biggest percentage because that obscure band probably still owes the label a lot. But that’s a whole other story. 😄

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?